Curators' blog

Name:
Steve Rigden
Email:
s.rigden@nls.uk
Date:
22/01/10

John Cam Hobhouse on biographers

Extract from MS.42297 : observations on John Galt's biography of Lord Byron

"If the Reviewing of books be, as Mr Southey calls it, 'an [?] craft' the making of them is, for the most part, a dishonest one - and that department of literature which ought to be entrusted to those only who are distinguished for their moral qualities, is, not unfrequently, in the hands of authors totally devoid of good taste - good feeling - and generous sentiment - The writers of Lives have, in our time, assumed a licence not enjoyed by their more scrupulous predecessors - for they interweave the adventures of the living with the memoirs of the dead; and, pretending to pourtray the peculiarities which sometimes mark the man of genius, they invade the privacy and disturb the peace of his surviving associates - an end should be put to this dishonorable practice - otherwise suspicion and caution and reserve will palsy the warmth of friendship - and social intercourse be sacrificed to the fear of that most unprincipled of all adventurers, a booksellers hack. And yet it is not likely that this outrage should receive its chastisement ; for who that has a due regard for his own character would contend with an antagonist who has already proved himself insensible to shame and unworthy of an honorable opponent?"

 
Name:
Steve Rigden
Email:
s.rigden@nls.uk
Date:
15/01/10

Not only a would-be poet, but an infidel too!

Letter, 23 April 1875, of the Reverend Whitwell Elwin to John Murray III condemning the 'poetry' of one Wilfred Blunt.

"I fear that many persons write poetry because they are not able to write prose. They hope that the metre will conceal the poverty of the ideas. I am appalled to say that Mr. Blunt is a versifier of this class. His pieces are really below criticism, and it would be wasting words to go into details. Moreover he appears to me to be an infidel, though it is difficult to be sure of the meaning he intends his lines to bear, writing as he does in such vague, misty language that you cannot tell what he is at. But the apparent drift of several of his pieces is rank infidelity, and perhaps atheism. I read some of the poems to my wife and when I commenced reading a sonnet beginning with the line, "Why was I born in this degenerate age?" she said parenthetically "I should think because he was not fit for a better". And certainly he has no right to complain of his lot. There ought to be no hesitation in peremptorily declining to countenance the poems in any way. Ld. Lytton's opinion is nothing. He is warm-hearted; and friendly feelings with him always overpower his judgement."

 
Name:
Steve Rigden
Email:
s.rigden@nls.uk
Date:
11/11/09

In remembrance.

Obscured by the long shadows cast over the John Murray Archive by the great and the good are many whose lives were not such that we should have reason to know of them : of whom, indeed, we would seem to know almost nothing at all beyond a name on a letter. However, even these people have their stories. Often a few details and a keen curiosity may be combined rewardingly to allow at least some part of their stories to be told.

Such has been the case with a young chap called James Hewitt of whom the Archive holds two charming, but otherwise unremarkable, letters.

My colleague Lauren came upon the letters as she was undertaking the task of merging the three series of the letters to the various John Murrays. Ordinarily she had only time to look for the addresser's name on each letter to ensure that it was in the correct alphabetical sequence, before moving on to the next letter to repeat the same, and so on and so forth.

Hewitt, however, had signed the first of his letters to John Murray :

"I am
Sir
Respectfully yours
J. F. Hewitt
(aged 10)"

The statement of his tender years caused Lauren to pause to read the brief letters. Master Hewitt had written to the publisher to acquaint him with a mistake that he had noticed in a Latin textbook. He wrote :

"Will you please allow me to call your attention to a small error In Principia Latina, part I, Exercise XXXI, Sentence 5, Edition 1897. Should not 'Graeci' have been 'Graecia', to agree with the verb 'afflicta est'?"

Such precociousness! Would not the publisher have smiled broadly, perhaps he even laughed aloud, in admiration of the cleverness of the boy? That his reaction was one of appreciation is confirmed by a note that he scribbled in the top right-hand corner of the letter :

"Thanks and sent copy of Aesop"

The gift of a copy of Aesop's Fables was generous. It was also apt, as young Hewitt was to prove himself to have been rather more impish than virtuous in his observations on Latin. Whether it was old Aesop who, as he has done so often, served as a guide to the wayward, or whether Hewitt was embarrassed by the gift, he wrote again to Murray:

"Thank you so very much for the beautiful book you have sent me, which I do not deserve, as it was my teacher that found out the mistake."

As if to prove himself a truly reformed character, he continued :

"Another copy of Aesop's Fables arrived this morning so I am returning it. Again thanking you, I remain
Yours very truly
James Francis Hewitt"

Lauren was delighted by the letters and showed them to her colleagues. It was suggested that she should show them to her line manager who, having "some Latin", and being never without an editor's sharpened red pencil protruding threateningly from the top pocket of his jacket, would undoubtedly enjoy the content of the letters.

A suggestion that had been slightly mischievous in intent proved to have been inspired. The line manager soon picked over the few concrete details of the letters.

One of his personal interests happened to be the Great War and so looking at the letters he began to wonder : "Hewitt wrote the letter in 1898 when he was ten. By the time of the Great War ... he would probably have served? If so, did he survive?".

What had begun as a cheerful appreciation of the temerity of youth had become a more sober enquiry.

The line manager continued to consider the first letter, noting the address. "Gatehouse, N.B. [North Britain]? ... Kirkcudbrightshire, of course. Now, his father was an honourable - see, the boy gives his address 'co the Honble. W.J. Hewitt '... To the stud book!."

Lauren was puzzled. "The stud book?" she questioned.

"Yes! Debrett's Peerage and Baronetage ... over there", he replied waving his hand in the direction of a book press. "If his father was an honourable he'll be in Debrett's, and being in it we'll know who his sons were."

Witnessing the peculiar workings of an archivist's mind was indeed fascinating! He was soon perusing the entry for "Lifford", under which title he found exactly what he was looking for : "The Viscount Lifford, Evelyn James Hewitt ... James, 2nd Viscount ... James, 3rd Viscount ... James 4th Viscount ... William James, J.P. Kirkcudbrightshire and Fife, heir presumptive ... That's the father, W. J. Hewitt and ... yes! his son was James Francis , Lieutenant 1st Battalion Scottish Rifles. Born 23 January 1888 - which would have made him ten years old in 1898! ..." He paused. "Killed in action 26 October 1914".

Hewitt was 26 years old when killed. He is commemorated on the Ploegstreet Memorial in Belgium. His brother William, a Lieutenant in the 3rd Battalion Royal Scots, was also killed in action, a fortnight before his brother. He was just 22.

 
Name:
Steve Rigden
Email:
s.rigden@nls.uk
Date:
15/10/09

Gentle distinction.

[1 October 1862.] Letter of "Helen Dufferin" to John Murray III in which she explains the reason for having to style herself "Helen, Lady Dufferin" on the proposed title page to her work, "Lispings from Low Latitudes, or, Extracts from the Journal of the Hon. Impulsia Gushington".

"I am obliged to take this title, as there is so soon to be a young Lady Dufferin, and there already exists an older Lady D. than myself, who stickles for the honourable privilege of being styled The Dowager Lady Dufferin."

 
Name:
Steve Rigden
Email:
s.rigden@nls.uk
Date:
06/10/09

Not to be trusted then?

Toronto, 26 July 1837. Letter of Francis Head to John Murray II.

"As I know you like shining in society I send you a scrap which you may learn by heart and apply to the first person whose veracity you may think it adviseable to deny."

The "scrap", a cutting from a newspaper, has been pasted to the letter and reads :

"He is, without exception, the most notorious liar in all Mississippi. He lies out of every pore in his skin. Whether he be sleeping or waking on foot or on horse-back, at church or in the grog shop, talking with his neighbours or writing for the newspapers, a multitudinous swarm of lies, visible, palpable and tangible, are buzzing and settling around him like flies around a horse in August" -
Commercial Advertiser.

Head was in Canada as the lieutenant-governor of Upper Canada. The letter has as a postscript the rather matter of fact comment :

"I am just going to meet again at Manatoulin Island in Lake Huron all the Indian Tribes of Canada."

... as you do!

 
Name:
Lauren Forbes
Email:
l.forbes@nls.uk
Date:
29/09/09

A final blog - one of my favourite letters

Among the countless 'general' letters to the firm of Murray, is one written in 1909 from an aspiring novelist. This is quite common - many people wrote saying, basically, 'please publish my book!'. If they received a courteous rejection, they often wrote again, pleading their cause, and insisting their work be reconsidered. Not so this young woman. There is just one letter from her, but the content makes clear that her manuscript has been turned down.

Her response is humble, elegant and utterly charming. She realises that her first attempt was unlikely to be published, and is not surprised at its return. However she goes on to say that Murray's ending words have truly encouraged her, that she will keep writing, and will hope for success in the future.

Her name? I recognised it at once, as the writer of many poems & stories I read as a child and greatly enjoyed - Eleanor Farjeon.

 
Name:
Lauren Forbes
Email:
l.forbes@nls.uk
Date:
19/08/09

Do authors have consciences?

John Murray III certainly had his doubts about that. Writing to fellow publishers Messrs Mosley & Sons in 1854, he warns them they need to set up cast-iron agreements to guarantee that authors won't take any 2nd or subsequent editions of their books elsewhere. No doubt speaking from bitter experience he remarks:

"If authors had consciences the injustice would not occur, but if they have any - in 99 cases out of 100 they are utterly seared".

 
Name:
Lauren Forbes
Email:
l.forbes@nls.uk
Date:
05/08/09

What's in a name?

I'm checking the transcription of David Livingstone's Analysis of the Language of the Bechuanas, and I came across a familiar sounding word. He's listing endings and the meanings they give to words:

"-ama, meaning prone: oba, to bow; obama, bow down to the earth = prone"

No doubt this name has other meanings in other languages, as happens with words, but I quite like this one, it has something of humility in it, a quality its namesake seems to reflect.

 
Name:
Lauren Forbes
Email:
l.forbes@nls.uk
Date:
10/07/09

A poet's worth

What can a poet do for local tourism? Arthur Patchett Martin (1851-1902) was an Australian poet & literary editor who was born in England and returned there later in his life. There are 3 letters of his in the archive, 2 written from the Isle of Wight, no doubt a favoured holiday spot. Along with the letters is a press-cutting of a letter he wrote to the Editor of Vectis, presumably a periodical associated with the island. The letter concerns his (Martin's) suggestion that Cliff Green on the island should be called Keats' Green, as Keats stayed there briefly at one point. I like the way he makes his case!

"Now, sir, as you know, a living poet - unless he be very fashionable, and keeps a butler, is little use to anybody; in fact he rarely goes to church, and generally runs into debt even with his landlady - a person to be shunned. But a dead poet - provided he be one of his true immortal Song-birds - may be worth a mint of money to an aspiring sea-side resort... You see I am practical, in my 'Keats' suggestion - not merely 'literary' or weakly 'sentimental'."

I had a quick check on Google, and it seems his argument won the day.

 
Name:
Lauren Forbes
Email:
l.forbes@nls.uk
Date:
27/05/09

Come to Edinburgh for a walk on the wild side

More from James Nasmyth, reminiscing about walks with his father around Scotland's capital:

I know of no city to compare with Edinburgh in affording the most rich material for this kind of tranquil enjoyment and healthy rest to the mind and body, the beauty and variety of the elements of the scenery around Edinburgh are so great combining the bustle and activity of a city with the solitude of almost wild mountain scenery such as can be met with on and about Arthurs seat which can be easily reached by a leisurely walk of three quarters of an hour or even less time from the centre of the city.

More "city" is now visible from the top of Arthur's Seat, but this description remains absolutely true today...

 
Name:
Lauren Forbes
Email:
l.forbes@nls.uk
Date:
06/05/09

An honest politician?

I'm trying to identify some unknown correspondents within the archive - some have used a pseudonym, or just given their initials, and some letters are unsigned. One such 'unknown' is a small plain postcard sent to Murray from Torquay in April 1921, and signed 'E. P.' The handwriting is a little unclear, but the correspondent has sent some writing to Murray and the postcard is sent in pleasure at the publisher's positive response. The writing must have been connected with politics, as E.P. finishes with the brief remark:

"The men honest enough to trust as politicians are too honest to go into politics!"

Discuss...

 
Name:
Steve Rigden
Email:
s.rigden@nls.uk
Date:
05/05/09

The decorousness of the French language.

Letter of William Knapp, editor of the works of George Borrow, to John Murray, sharing perhaps just a little too much information!

"Yours of the 21st gave
me great pleasure and en-
couragement. It found me
very ill as I had been since
the 16th, and in terrific
pain with a trouble in the
bowels. At last the right
remedy was hit on, and
I was soulagé dans un quart
d'heure. Then, tho' weak,
I went to work on the ac-
cumulated proof of Lav-
engro
, & have only just
sent off the last batch."

 
Name:
Lauren Forbes
Email:
l.forbes@nls.uk
Date:
01/05/09

Things to do after a hard night's drinking: no. 256 - go for a 7 mile walk?

Alexander Nasmyth the artist (1758-1840) became a good friend of Robert Burns, and is best known for his portrait of the Bard. They shared a deep love of nature, and Nasmyth reported an incident which he felt showed Burns' heartfelt appreciation for nature's beauties - he also believed it disproved the common view that Burns, once in convivial company, liked his drink a bit too much. The story is given with vivid description in the manuscript of James Nasmyth's autobiography (son of Alexander):

- Alexander Nasmyth, Burns and some friends have admittedly been enjoying a drink or two in an Edinburgh tavern:

"When the party broke up about 3 in the morning as Burns and my father descended into the Street Burns looked up to the Sky, which was perfectly clear and the rising sun just beginning to brighten up the Kirk steeple and highest parts of the houses. The date was June 13 1786, a period of the year when all nature is in the zenith of its youthful beauty. Burns was so impressed with the beauty of the morning that he put his hand on my fathers arm and said: "Nasmyth it'll never do to go to bed in such a lively morning as this! Let's away and walk out to Roslin Castle."

The poet and painter thereupon set forth and enjoyed a most delightful summer morning walk of 7 miles"

So, fair enough, he liked a party - but nature still came first!

 
Name:
Steve Rigden
Email:
s.rigden@nls.uk
Date:
30/04/09

"The shadow of a shade" - Mary Shelley seeks entry to the House of Commons.

MS.42291. 19 February [1825]. A delightful letter of Mary Shelley to John Cam Hobhouse requesting his assistance in allowing her access to hear a debate in the House of Commons.

"I am going I am afraid to trespass
most unwarrantably on your politeness -
I can only say in excuse - that the object to
me is important, & since my difficulty arises
from restrictions placed by you the virtual
majority upon us the weaker portion, I
feel as if I had some / the shadow of
a shade / claim upon your gallantry.
I have often wished to be present
at a debate in the House of Commons - Two
circumstances spur this wish at the
present time. First I am enagaged in a tale
which will certainly be more defective than
it would otherwise be, if I am not permitted
to be present at a debate - And besides
the animated discussions now going on, the
splendid eloquence displayed, are beyond
words objects of attraction to me. I consider
it a great misfortune not [to] have heard
the debate of last Tuesday.
I hear that there is a place, over
the roof of Mr. [?Stephens] where you
senators permit us to hear,
not seen. Could you introduce me to this
enviable port? - Would you? I
make the request frankly - deny me in the
same manner if I be too intrusive."

In the last paragraph of the letter Shelley comments briefly on the recently published "Narrative of Lord Byron's last journey to Greece. Extracted from the journal of Count Peter Gamba" (London : John Murray, 1825).

"I think Gamba's book
decidedly one of the most interesting upon
Lord Byron - it is simple, affecting &
praises without praising -"

 
Name:
Steve Rigden
Email:
s.rigden@nls.uk
Date:
24/04/09

To be published or to "blush unseen"?

Letter of Harriot Georgina Hamilton-Temple-Blackwood, Marchioness of Dufferin and Ava, to John Murray.

"I write to you as an old friend - though in a sort of way, on business matters! - and I want you to give your honest opinion & advise as a friend only - I also beg you to consider the matter as quite confidential.
I will tell you as shortly as I can the whole story. During the four years I was in India I kept a daily journal, which I sent home weekly to my mother, & which, having been printed in our private press is easily read - or skipped through. Now I want to know from some experienced person & good judge, whether selections from it would be worth bringing out as a book.
It would be false modesty in me not to explain that I am quite aware my name & my having been "Vicereine" in India, would make the greatest rubbish sell & succeed in that way. But I should not like to publish "rubbish" & I now ask you to look at this journal, I do so because I want your opinion solely on the question of merit, & because I feel sure you will do this kindness for me. Dont spare me in the least in the way of criticism for I have never set up to be "an authoress", & I should infinitely prefer the plainest truths now while there is time to "blush unseen", to the fate that would befall me later were I to produce a worthless book - or one of which in any way Lord Dufferin or I might be ashamed.
The mention of his name reminds me to say that he has never read a word of my journal, & does not know of this very bold step of mine, which, I feel sure would alarm him much! But what I propose to do, if you so far encourage me, is to send you one volume of the aforesaid journal which will show you the sort of thing it is, - if you approve of that, the other three ; - & then to ask you to write me your opinion on this subject which I lay before you.
As I have said the journal is a daily one, & there is therefore a great mass of uninteresting matter mixed with the more interesting parts - but I should think that a book of about the size of the "Sunbeam" might be got out of the whole - if it is worth publishing at all. - Your opinion I should then submit to Lord Dufferin - provided it is favourable! - and after that I should have many more questions to ask you, which I need not enter into now.
In reply to this letter will you tell me if you have time to look at the journal? - & where I should send it to? Please say also, if you would prefer the whole, or a part of it now? -"

Lady Dufferin's journal was published by John Murray in 1889 under the title :
"Our viceregal life in India. Selections from my journal 1884-1888".

 
Name:
Steve Rigden
Email:
s.rigden@nls.uk
Date:
15/04/09

Some reference! Some servant!

A typescript copy of an "Extract from a letter of Lord Dufferin" in which he outlines the virtues of his most trusted servant, Frederick Nowell. Unfortunately, the addressee of the letter is not recorded.

"For the last twenty four years I have had in my employment one of the best servants that probably is to be found in England. His name is Frederick Nowell. He comes of a highly respectable family settled at Isleworth. He went with me originally to Canada in 1872 as footman, and in a year or two I made him my valet and groom of the chambers, and shortly afterwards my Butler and head Steward. In this latter situation he displayed a most remarkable capacity for managing a large establishment. Nothing ever went wrong under his superintendence; nor did I ever have the slightest trouble, no matter how numerous or complicated the entertainments I was giving. From Canada he went with me to St. Petersburg, where we gave great balls and dinners, with the same success. He proved also an admirable purveyor and organizer of our bear shooting expeditions, which took us often two or three hundred miles away into a wild country. He showed the same capacity both at Constantinople and in Egypt ; but his reputation culminated in India, where he had four hundred native servants under him, and dinners of a hundred and a hundred and twenty to arrange for. From India he came with me to Rome and to Paris, where we have sometimes issued invitations to two thousand people, and I can truthfully say that no one has ever come to my house who has not been struck by the smoothness of the domestic machinery. Now, however, that I am retiring from official life, and about to maintain a somewhat modest establishment in Ireland, it would be a great waste of power, and doing so good a man an ill turn, to keep him with me. Nowell is tall, with a good figure, very good looking, and his manners are excellent. That he is sober and honest goes without saying. He is unmarried, having lost his wife, who was Lady Dufferin's maid. She has left him with two boys, whom he is educating admirably. He is well known to the Duke of Connaught, who I am aware has a good opinion of him, and of course to Lord William Beresford, who was his immediate chief in India, as well as to the Duke of Bedford, Earl Compton, Sir Alfred Lyall, Sir Donald Wallace and hundreds of other people. As a further proof of his efficiency, I may mention that when Lord Alington came once or twice to dine or lunch with me at Paris, he asked me who my butler was, for everything seemed to be so well managed. When I told him, he said, 'Yes, I spotted him at once as a good man'. This was as creditable to Lord Alington's quickness of perception as to Nowell himself."

 
Name:
Steve Rigden
Email:
s.rigden@nls.uk
Date:
08/04/09

Wordsworth on genius.

30 January 1833. A comment from a letter of William Wordsworth to Miss Kinnaird.

"What a monster is a Man of Genius whose heart is perverted!"

 
Name:
Steve Rigden
Email:
s.rigden@nls.uk
Date:
12/03/09

Gladstone condemned. The nude considered.

MS.42171, ff. 99v.-100r.

Lady Elizabeth Eastlake to Sir Austen Henry Layard, 25 May 1885.

Commenting upon the effects of Gladstone's second government, Lady Eastlake writes :

"Even at Venice you are not out of the reach of our political weather! It is hard to see every one powerless to break thro' the evil spells of that fiend Gladstone. (I have plenty of monosyllables to define him.) I know of some English gentlemen, & hear of more, who will not go abroad this summer, because positively ashamed to look foreigners in the face. What a new position!"

On a lighter subject, Lady Eastlake remarks upon a discussion in 'The Times' concerning the issue of the nude in art.

"As you see the Times you will have been amused - (and of course shocked) at this discussion about nudities. They seem to me all wide of the mark - tho' I take part with the British Matron morally - but it is all really a question of Art. Really fine Art will never raise a blush. It is also a matter of scale. Mulready [sic] exquisite drawings were not above 9 inches. Poynter's young lady - judging from the illustrated Catalogue - has not a defence."

 
Name:
Lauren Forbes
Email:
l.forbes@nls.uk
Date:
09/03/09

The author in night-wear...

William Clowes & Sons was one of the printing firms used by Murray. I've happened upon an amusing letter from George Clowes to Murray, written in February 1839. There's obviously been an urgent request for a report by Sir Francis Head to be printed - he was a colonial governor, not long back from dealing controversially with problems in Canada. It seems there isn't a moment to lose... George Clowes writes:

"I send you the binder's note, and although I think he might have given us more time for drying and pressing the work, I will not run any risk, but detain all hands and machines through the night to accomplish this rather arduous matter".

A note at the top of the letter shows how 'pressing' this is:

"Sir F. Head is here with his dressing gown on, and will not leave before all is ready for press, which will not I think be the case before 6 in the morning".

You begin to see how he got the nickname 'Galloping Head'.

 
Name:
Lauren Forbes
Email:
l.forbes@nls.uk
Date:
20/02/09

The art of self-description

There are quite a few letters in the archive from Walter Weston, who worked as a missionary in Japan and was also a keen mountaineer, becoming an authority on mountaineering there. He writes to Murray on 26th December 1895 with suggested wording for the announcement of his book on the Japanese Alps. He says:

"I have put a rather long string of letters after my name from which you might make a choice - if you think any are worth while keeping in at all"

The list isn't actually as bad as some, and he describes himself as:

"the Revd Walter Weston M.A., F.R.G.S., F.S.A. Member of The Alpine Club The Asiatic Society of Japan The Geographical Society of Tokyo. Late British Chaplain, Kobe, Japan".

He ends his letter:

"Hoping the bairns are well - in spite of Christmas"

- perhaps he was worried about too many mince pies?

 
Name:
Steve Rigden
Email:
s.rigden@nls.uk
Date:
17/02/09

"Brain-fag".

?23 August 1899. Isabella Bird Bishop writes to Murray during the process of preparing for publication "The Yangtze Valley and Beyond".

"I fear that my estimate of the remaining pages may not be at all clear. I am suffering terribly from 'Brain-fag' - a great disinclination for mental effort and almost an incapacity for it."

 
Name:
Steve Rigden
Email:
s.rigden@nls.uk
Date:
05/02/09

Sticks, stones, broken bones, names - and all that.

The Earl of Shrewsbury writing from Palermo in March 1846 to the Editor of "Murray's Handbook to France" :

"I cannot but remark that you always use the offensive terms Romish & Romanists, instead of Catholic. The former is a nick-name, & intended in an injurious sense to those whom it is meant to designate. Surely a book intended for all, ought to be free from offensive aspersions on any. Truth never can justly offend, let it be as unpalatable as it may : but expressions used in contempt or derision are breaches of Charity & ought to be avoided. I am sure that on reflexion you will see the justice of these remarks."

 
Name:
Lauren Forbes
Email:
l.forbes@nls.uk
Date:
28/01/09

The Ettrick Shepherd (again)

James Hogg, the Ettrick Shepherd, is one of my favourite characters in the archive - he just tells it like it is! Here are a couple of excerpts from a letter written to Byron on 1st June 1814. Hogg thanks Byron for his contribution to a publication he was putting together, and admits:

"The truth is that you were the only Bard of whom I was afraid I would get no assistance, for from your poems I suspected that you were a dour ill-natured chiel, but I am beginning to think I was quite mistaken and your letter has put me in extraordinary spirits."

Excellent! I hope Byron laughed at that, rather than taking offence. Meanwhile Hogg is complimentary about Murray, despite his trade:

"If you ever see Murray give my kindest respects to him - he has as you said dealt very fairly with me and very friendly though as yet he has made no profit of me which is in general the bookseller's great inducement to friendship."

He was quoted in this blog on 18th Jan last year as 'honest Hogg', and I have to agree...

 
Name:
Steve Rigden
Email:
s.rigden@nls.uk
Date:
07/01/09

David Livingstone, the American Civil War and a lady from Constantinople.

MS.42423, ff. 3-4. An interesting letter of Harriette Livingstone to David Livingstone. Harriette was the wife of Charles Livingstone, David's brother. Writing from New York on the 10th February 1865 she remarks on the American Civil War, in particular, making reference to Robert Livingstone, David's eldest son, who had taken up arms for the North.

From all I can learn I conclude that Robert must be a prisoner. If so I pity him. The tender mercies of the Rebels are cruel. They are trained to the practice of cruelty from their cradles. Vigorous measures are now used to secure the exchange of prisoners. A thousand were brought to Annapolis this week of whom the Col. says "they are the best conditioned set of prisoners ever exchanged. Most of them can walk". The appearance of those brought here beggars description. Two thirds of them die. I saw a long list of Rebel falsehoods in the Journal this morning in reference to our unwillingness to exchange.

Sadly, Robert Livingstone had actually died in a prisoner camp at Salisbury, North Carolina, on 5 December 1864. David Livingstone did not learn the fate of his son until June 1865.

Continuing the letter, Harriette comments on possible opportunities in the South for her husband after the war :

I saw the Vice Consul in Boston a few days since - (not the veritable Portuguese himself.) Only his agent. He says there are vacancies at Savannah and N. Orleans to be filled as soon as the war closes - And if one wants them application should be made at once - We feel that the Rebellion is winding up - There will be more hard fighting no doubt but I think that in about a year from this we may look for a cessation of hostilities - And you know my opinion is worth something. I do not know as they would be willing to transfer Charles so soon - but I do wish he could secure Savanah - Georgia is the most intelligent of the Southern States and with slavery abolished it would be a good situation.

Of her brother-in-law she observes:

The newspapers keep us well posted in reference to your matters - The latest is that you were married to a Constantinople lady. I think it is too bad that you did not bring her to England and give us an introduction.

 
Name:
Steve Rigden
Email:
s.rigden@nls.uk
Date:
24/11/08

Blame the printer!

20 September 1899. On a post card to Hallam Murray Mrs. Bishop blames her printer unreservedly for introducing errors into the proofs of her work 'The Yangtze Valley and beyond':

I am amazed to find that the printer should have ventured on these liberties! I wish I had protested earlier, for he has throughout, so far as I have looked at the sheets this morning, altered my punctuation to the injury both of the sense and harmony of many passages. I thought it had been done in Albemarle St so I remained silent till the Chinese words were interfered with! I am really indignant with him. I do not yet know what outrages he has perpetuated.

An affronted author, a printer accused : evidently a situation requiring all the tact and diplomacy of the publisher. Hallam Murray, therefore, forwarded Mrs. Bishop's rather belligerent postcard direct to the printer!

On the 22 September 1899 the printer, William Brendon & Son, West Hoe, Plymouth, replied to Murray:

Thank you for sending us Mrs Bishop's post card of the 20th again complaining [Had they the measure of the lady?].

Respecting her complaints :-
The punctuation has been but very little interfered with, and certainly not to the extent of altering the sense of any passages.
The Chinese words were altered in some cases in the first few sheets in order to make them agree with what Mrs Bishop herself had marked in some places but overlooked in others. As the author herself, however, was so inconsistent, the attempt at uniformity was given-up in the remainder of the book.
Most of the marks made were to correct printers' errors which had escaped the notice of the Author.

Did this answer quell Mrs. Bishop's ire? Only in part, for in a letter to Murray of 29 September she comments :

Brendon's letter makes out a good case in reply to some of my protests.

but she continues :

Certainly it was terrible that I should overlook 400, 000 millions [an unexplained reference]! That is brought forward to distract attention from his misdemeanors!

 
Name:
Steve Rigden
Email:
s.rigden@nls.uk
Date:
10/11/08

The publisher's thoughts enflamed?

3 May 1860. The Rev. Whitwell Elwin writes to Murray from Booton Rectory, Norwich.

I have a suspicion that one of your letters has been burnt & to this you must impute the omission to answer any question you may have asked. The window, which is opposite the fire-place in my little study, was left open on a windy morning when the fire was lighted. The letters were piled on my desk, & Mrs. E. going in found one of them half consumed, & apparently the fragments of another which she thought had a trace of your hand-writing. It vanished into ashes at the touch.

 
Name:
Lauren Forbes
Email:
l.forbes@nls.uk
Date:
06/11/08

An honest man

Anthony W Thorold (1825-1895) became Bishop of Winchester, and his entry in the Dictionary of National Biography says that he liked to travel for recreation. This favoured hobby shows in his letters where he often reminds Murray of a kind promise Murray made to lend or give him the travel handbooks for the countries he planned to visit. One letter, written in July 1869 (before he became a bishop), thanks Murray for the Handbook to Yorkshire, given for a different reason:

I thank you exceedingly for your thoughtful & prompt kindness in sending me your Handbook of a County in which I seemed likely soon to have a permanent & a personal interest. But I have felt it my duty to decline Doncaster: not being sufficiently sure of my new strength for duties very severe: & so thinking it better not to risk disappointment.

As an honest man I suppose I ought to return you Yorkshire. Not being honest I think I shall keep it, as the book contains your handwriting, & also the notice of a fact which was very nearly occurring.

Sounds good Bishop material to me!

 
Name:
Steve Rigden
Email:
s.rigden@nls.uk
Date:
06/11/08

Saints and sinners : on the character of women.

11 September 1881. Lady Eastlake to Austen Henry Layard

You remember my dining with you in Saville Row before you went to Norway. Why on earth did you attack me about my false judgements on my sex generally! It has dwelt in my mind ever since, and so now I will give you my simple answer. I judge of my sister women in a very matter of fact way - as to whether, namely, they are good daughters - wives - or mothers - and there are none of them hardly who do not fill one of these characters. I have no other test of character.
If you fancied me censorious about fast ladies I beg to say that they are not in my line - I still less in theirs - or we do not come across one another. You had a fascinating woman next you - in the evening - at the Balls. She was not in my line, however you might be in hers!

 
Name:
Steve Rigden
Email:
s.rigden@nls.uk
Date:
04/11/08

The young lady, the would-be artist and the Lord Chancellor.

7 August 1874. A letter of Lady Eastlake to Austen Henry Layard.

The other day I had tidings from good Acton Tindal wh: will interest you. Good-looking Nico -the eldest son - has lost his heart to a young lady of £4000 a year, a Miss Carill-Worsely. Or rather this young lady has consented to take his heart - without which his losing it wd have been useless - provided the Lord Chancellor allow her to do so. She is Ward in Chancery - 17 years of age - very pretty - fine figure - etc. etc. Her fortune is chiefly in land - some of it building land in Manchester - but all strictly tied up by will of her father - who was a lover of Mrs Tindal's. Both have taken the epidemic very violently, the more so as, till the Chancellor's consent be obtained, they are not allowed to meet or correspond. At the same time they have settled to marry in February next - when she will be 18.

What of the dashing young gentleman?

Nico seems to be a lucky young man - at the same time the young lady and her fortune will be in good hands. All those three sons are very steady - tho' Nico has cared for nothing so much as drawing, wh: of late he has stuck seriously to. Now he will be able to indulge it to heart's content.

 
Name:
Lauren Forbes
Email:
l.forbes@nls.uk
Date:
03/11/08

Praise for the Queen of Science

I've just come across the letters of Allen Thomson (1809-1884), anatomist & embryologist. In one letter to Murray, dated 29th May 1835, he comments on the second edition of Mary Somerville's book (Connexion of the physical sciences):

"I take a little of Mrs Somerville's second edition very often, for a little of such a book, so concise and so replete with facts, goes a great way; how elegantly and simply it is written and how accurately it is expressed; how like it is to herself in every respect! how superior to some of the Bridgewater treatises!"

The Bridgewater treatises had been commissioned in the will of the 8th Earl of Bridgewater, Francis Henry Egerton (1756-1829), who directed that 1000 copies should be written and published of a work 'On the Power, Wisdom and Goodness of God, as manifested in the Creation'. Among the eight scientists/philosophers chosen to write the treatises were physician Peter Mark Roget (also of Roget's Thesaurus fame) and geologist William Buckland.

 
Name:
Steve Rigden
Email:
s.rigden@nls.uk
Date:
27/10/08

Not to the liking of the editor.

11 May 1865. Whitwell Elwin to John Murray commenting upon an unnamed and unfortunate dramatist.

There are four main ingredients in a drama - the plot, the characters, the incidents and the dialogue. The manuscript did not appear to me a success in any one of them. The plot excited no suspense, the characters were rather speaking abstractions than living realities, and the incidents were not sufficiently rapid and stirring. It is, however, on the dialogue that the author seems principally to have relied, and here also, I fear, he has failed. Unless blank verse is written with consumate skill it is only prose cut up into lengths, and the present drama is deficient both in metrical harmony, and variety of rythm. The language, too, is without that peculiar felicity of expression which is essential to poetry, and I believe the writer would completely throw away his talents in cultivating a branch of literature which nearly everybody tries, and in which scarce anybody succeeds. The subject he has selected does not appeal to the sympathies of the present generation, but a better theme would do nothing towards remedying the other shortcomings.

 
Name:
Steve Rigden
Email:
s.rigden@nls.uk
Date:
22/10/08

Reviewers reviewed

On the 3 August [1860] Charles Darwin wrote to John Murray expressing his thanks on having received a copy of the 'Quarterly Review'. Murray had sent the issue because it included a review of Darwin's 'On the origin of species'. Whilst having been unconcerned by the way that the article had challenged his theory, there having been 'hardly any malice' in the review, Darwin did allow himself the following gentle comment upon those who made it their business to write reviews:

' ... these very clever men think they can write a review with a very slight knowledge of the Book reviewed or subject in question ...'

 
Name:
Lauren Forbes
Email:
l.forbes@nls.uk
Date:
22/10/08

A life in the day of...

As I think I've mentioned before, some of the correspondence in the archive has nothing whatever to do with publishing, and such letters often add colour to the picture of life during the archive's time-span. They provide tiny glimpses into people's lives, and a genealogist could have a field-day. I've just happened upon a short letter to Murray from a Mrs Laura W. Taylor of Wandsworth, written in August 1868:

Dear Sir

I should feel greatly obliged if you would kindly bestow your vote for the next Election of the London Orphan Asylum in favor of the applicant whose card I enclose & whose case I am well acquainted with & know to be one of great urgency & in every way deserving of support.

A note at the top of the next page reads: "Candidate, Fredk Stone (aged 7)"

I wonder what became of Frederick Stone...

 
Name:
Steve Rigden
Email:
s.rigden@nls.uk
Date:
21/10/08

A pleasure deferred.

In May 1887 the actress Fanny Stirling wrote to James Nasmyth, engineer and amateur astronomer, to thank him for the gift of one of his publications. She commented cheerily, if perhaps a little unconvincingly :

Gratitude is as you know - "a lively anticipation of favours to come" - so - while thanking you for my book I am on the look out for the sketches! the book seems delightful tho' I haven't cut a leaf yet but have looked at the pictures and caught a peep here and there of a few words which I could almost fancy I heard you saying! I know I shall like it.

 
Name:
Lauren Forbes
Email:
l.forbes@nls.uk
Date:
08/10/08

The confident author

We had just been discussing authors' various ways of approaching their publisher, whether diffident, timid or whatever, but this letter from novelist Julian Sturgis (presumably responding to a suggestion by Murray) illustrates the bold approach. Writing in Nov. 1889 he says:

My dear Murray

I write one line to say that I have looked over the bit in my "Comedy of a Country House", and I do not care to change anything in the book.


Yrs very truly
Julian Sturgis

I like his style... and it sounds as if he did too.

 
Name:
Lauren Forbes
Email:
l.forbes@nls.uk
Date:
24/09/08

A Journal from Japan

I'm working my way through letters from people whose surname begins with 'S' (there are quite a few of them...). I've come to 2 letters from Marie Stopes, best known as a pioneer of family planning. However her scientific career started in the field of palaeobotany, the study of fossil plants. In 1907 she was awarded a Royal Society grant for research in this area, and spent 2 years in Japan, her work including "some very interesting travel."

In her first letter to Murray, dated July 15th, 1909, she is keen to offer her journal to the publisher of "Miss Bird's travels in Japan" [Isabella Bird Bishop]. The second letter (July 17th - quick turnaround!), responds to a no doubt polite rejection from Murray. He must have emphasised the unique nature of Mrs Bird Bishop's travels & writings, but understandably Marie Stopes underlines her own credentials as a pioneer - the only woman (at that time) awarded such a Royal Society grant to work overseas; the first female scientist to undertake an official visit to Japan and to work at Tokyo University; she had also been the first female member of staff in science at a UK university (Manchester) - these are just a few of her 'firsts'. I like her comment to Murray:

"I was the first European at several points in my journey, but that is a trifle."

John Murray was not persuaded, but Marie Stopes' A Journal from Japan was published in 1910 by Blackie & Son.

 
Name:
Lauren Forbes
Email:
l.forbes@nls.uk
Date:
04/09/08

Landing that punchy title

I'm amused by a letter of Charles Darwin's, written in August 1880. It's not to John Murray, as the content makes clear, but it doesn't name the intended recipient - perhaps Robert Cooke, Murray's nephew, who worked for the firm. Darwin begins by saying he'll be ready to send his manuscript to the printers in a month, so he must decide on a title (obviously a difficult task he has left to the end). He continues:

"My family shake their heads in the same dismal manner as you & Mr Murray did, when I told them my proposed title of 'The Circummutating Movements of Plants'..."

I'm sure they did, as I'm not convinced "circummutating" is in the dictionary - and it isn't exactly snappy, even for a scientific tome. But I just love the picture of this brilliant but perhaps slightly impractical scientist coming up with what seems to him a perfectly clear description of his work, while Mrs Darwin and the junior Darwins shake their heads in disbelief, thinking "Oh no, he's off again..." (or the 19th century equivalent). He finally settled for 'The power of movement in plants'.

 
Name:
Steve Rigden
Email:
s.rigden@nls.uk
Date:
12/08/08

Richard Ford and the art of poetic exasperation

In a letter of 1846 to John Murray concerning the handbook to Spain, Ford took exception to the significant changes that Murray wished to impose on his work. Ford's irritation is very apparent, but his closeness to Murray, clearly expressed in the letter, would appear to have tempered his response. Instead of acerbity he offered a rather delightful plaint :

I now will go to work commenting on your excisions = Oh matador of authors! Oh bowelless executioner of eminent pens! Oh Murray my Murray : et tu fili mi!!

I never was so annoyed in my life. I am preparing a form of oath never to write another line, when it is done hic castus artemq[ue] repono.

Before sending the letter Ford returned to this section of it, scribbling in the margin:

motto on tomb
Here lies
RF
Killed by
JM
Pray for his poor soul.

 
Name:
Steve Rigden
Email:
s.rigden@nls.uk
Date:
11/08/08

Beer and the bookseller.

Among the many interesting entries in the letterbooks of the first John Murray are several relating to his attempt to trade in beer. Included among the entries are the following "Directions for Beer".

Place what is first to be used upon its bottom in a beaufet or closet near at hand, and permit it to stand 14 days in this situation before it is used. If the weather is cold set it ten minutes before the fire [where it may receive benefit from the Fire]; then decant it in a glass jug or decanter, like wine; only in order to preserve its fineness do not go too near, but pour the last half pint of the bottle into a glass or tumbler by it self. This last glass will drink as well as any altho it will appear to have more sediment - By no means permit a servant to shake it in the removal from or carriage to table.

 
Name:
Steve Rigden
Email:
s.rigden@nls.uk
Date:
30/07/08

The health giving effect of Ramsgate.

Ramsgate in Kent has been described as having been one of the great English seaside towns of the 19th century. William Gifford, the first editor of the 'Quarterly Review', would certainly have agreed with that assessment.

In September 1815 Gifford wrote to John Murray II concerning matters to do with the 'Quarterly Review'. The serious business of editorial responsibility concluded, he turned to pleasantries, ending the letter with the following praise for Ramsgate :

I continue in far better health than I have lately known, or ever thought I should know - so much I owe to Ramsgate.

 
Name:
Lauren Forbes
Email:
l.forbes@nls.uk
Date:
29/07/08

A case of mistaken identity (or a molar expedition?)

A letter written in 1890 with young, easy-to-read writing, caught my eye today. (Anything with easy-to-read writing catches my eye). From an address in Chislehurst, it says:

Miss Solly presents her compliments to Mr Murray & very much regrets the mistake that has been made. Her note was written to make an appointment with Mr Morley a dentist in Albemarle Street, but as she did not know the number she supposes the postman made the mistake in the name. Miss Solly desires her sincere apologies for having given Mr Murray the trouble of a reply.

Sunday Jan 19th 1890

 
Name:
Steve Rigden
Email:
s.rigden@nls.uk
Date:
09/07/08

A charming letter of thanks.

A letter loosely inserted in the manuscript of William Napier's 'History of the War in the Peninsula'.

Decr. 27. 1901

My dear Sir

I wish I could find words which would represent my grateful feeling to you for your most kind present, but my 20 vol: Dictionary does not contain them, so I must content myself with the common-place but sincere form of "pray accept" my very hearty thanks for your most welcome present, all the more valuable as it is graced with the graceful words of "J Murray [?]" - I can never thank you enough, but I can & do give you on the other leaf some few unpublished lines of the great author of the Peninsular War - He paid a visit to Mrs T Moore one morning when they were preparing for young Tom starting on his school life - Mrs Moore's album was on the table & she said "Do write something in my album", & taking pen & ink he wrote these lines - I think they will interest you.

Yours very truly

J. B. Hughes.

A thousand Toms there are all Toms of wit
From Tom of Lincoln to the pert Tom Tit;
The midges dancing in the sunny beam,
The minnows basking in the pebly stream;
Are nought in number to the Toms of fame;
So Tom, my friend, do credit to your name;
Stick to your lessons & be good at school;
Lest people say with scorn 'there goes Tom fool'.

 
Name:
Lauren Forbes
Email:
l.forbes@nls.uk
Date:
20/06/08

A loving shepherd?

Hugh Richard Lawrie Sheppard, 1880-1937, known as Dick Sheppard, became Dean of Canterbury in 1929. His letters to John Murray pre-date this, beginning in 1912, with many dated 1914 when he was incumbent of St Martin-in-the-Fields, Trafalgar Square, but continuing up to the late 1920s. He seems to have been a hugely earnest and sincere Christian, whose health often broke down under the strain of his efforts. He was also a man of the people, preferring informality to institutionalism and stuffiness. Having witnessed the suffering of World War I soldiers he became a pacifist, and lead the newly formed Peace Pledge Union from 1936 until his death.

His letters to Murray hint at some of these qualities. For example, in 1914 he is keen for Murray to do the Bible readings at one of his services, and corresponds about this. However, he runs into trouble with his "very difficult, though quite well-meaning, Church-warden", who objects to lay people giving the readings in a Royal parish. Our good cleric remarks to Murray: "did you ever hear such rot?!". He manages a compromise with the warden by explaining who it is that he has invited to do the readings, but asks Murray to help him pacify the warden by giving the first reading only, rather than both.

One short note expresses real gratitude to Murray during a difficult time. Undated, it says, among other things:

"Most of my friends are kind in talking to me but mighty few think about it between whiles as you do".

Further evidence of their close friendship is found in a postcard from Capri, March 1925, perhaps a place of recovery during further ill health. It is signed, in deference to the Rev. W.A. Spooner, "Your Shoving Leopard".

If he intended to be a man of the people, he certainly succeeded. When he died in October 1937, 100,000 people filed past his coffin at St Martin's, and crowds lined the route to his funeral.

 
Name:
Steve Rigden
Email:
s.rigden@nls.uk
Date:
13/06/08

The 'hardihood' of a harrowing boy and the judgement of a master at Harrow

On the 7 November 1819 Henry Drury, assistant master at Harrow, wrote to Sir Benjamin Hobhouse. The letter concerned the waywardness of Sir Benjamin's son Isaac (the youngest brother of John Cam Hobhouse). In a long and considered letter, shortened below, Drury outlined the failings of Isaac - and then gave his judgement!

When I wrote to you after the Holidays, rather, I confess, too prematurely, expressing my satisfaction with the altered conduct of your son, up to the day on which I addressed you ; I had little reason to believe that I should so soon have found it necessary to change my opinion. ...
... he has endangered my property, and the lives of my family by letting off fireworks in my house / which no boy in my house, to my knowledge, ever yet had the hardihood to do / and among them Catherine wheels fixed against the wooden partitions of my passages. ...
... With regard to his ingratitude, and failure of every promise made by him to me, I shall not farther trouble you - You will oblige me, on receiving this, if at Whitton [Sir Benjamin's country seat], if you will send a chaise for him in the course of the Evening ; and, if you are at a greater distance, that you will take the earliest method for his removal - for I must really positively say, that no consideration whatever will induce me to keep him under my roof a day beyond what is absolutely necessary ...

Can't you just imagine the expression on the face of young Isaac, had he been accorded the courtesy of a chaise for his removal? Contrition? One suspects not.

 
Name:
Steve Rigden
Email:
s.rigden@nls.uk
Date:
20/05/08

Sir Austen Henry Layard on artists : John Everett Millais.

In a letter of ?1859 to Lady Elizabeth Eastlake Layard comments :

What are we coming to with Millais, his pictures this year? I am horrified and reduced to despair - the fall is indeed great, but what must a man come to who marries & then paints his wife's sisters?

 
Name:
Steve Rigden
Email:
s.rigden@nls.uk
Date:
16/05/08

Sir Austen Henry Layard on artists : Rossetti.

Layard's closing comment in a letter of ?1881 to Lady Elizabeth Eastlake.

I have been today to the Rosetti [sic] exhibition - I have my head full of his cadaverous females with sensual mouths.

 
Name:
Steve Rigden
Email:
s.rigden@nls.uk
Date:
14/05/08

The gentle art of criticism ...

A manuscript fragment from the papers concerning Lord Holland.

This book of yours is a singular thing. It is ill written, deficient in grammar, and often in English ; and yet it interests, and even amuses, now the subjects of it are all, I suppose, gone "ad plures" ; otherwise it would be intolerable. The writer richly deserves a kicking or a cudgelling at every page, and yet I am ashamed to say I have travelled unwearied with him thro' the whole, divided between a grin and a scowl. I never saw nor heard of such an animal, a splenetic, bustling kind of a poco-corante.

 
Name:
Lauren Forbes
Email:
l.forbes@nls.uk
Date:
18/04/08

Well said, sir!

There's no messing about with flowery language for Philip Pusey (1799-1855), agriculturist and elder brother of Edward Pusey, the prominent Church of England clergyman - only good, plain English will do. Fortunately a Murray publication finds great favour with him:

"I must take this opportunity of saying... that I think the Quarterly Review is almost our sole relief of plain manly English... Whatever captain you engage I trust you will stick to the vernacular. It is confined at present to you and the Times and Morning Chronicle."

Here here, top-notch etc. (oops, a bit of Latin creeping in there, sorry)

 
Name:
Lauren Forbes
Email:
l.forbes@nls.uk
Date:
28/03/08

Apropos old age

In a letter from a Raphael Roche to John Murray, written in London in 1927, he thanks Murray for the gift of a beautifully illustrated book sent to himself and his wife. Murray must have made some mention of health and age, as the letter continues:

"With regard to old age, I must tell you a story: Cherubini was dying in Paris; Berlioz calls on him. Cherubini says: "I shall never rise from this bed again, I'm dying." Berlioz: "Don't say that; a great artist & composer like you can never die." Cherubini: "Allons, Berlioz, pas de tes blagues; c'est sérieux cette-fois ci." [Come on, Berlioz, none of your jokes; it's serious this time.]

A colleague here did wonder if this would cheer John Murray up, but I liked it. I also like this letter for the request printed diagonally across the top left-hand corner: PLEASE WRITE LEGIBLY. Raphael Roche's own handwriting is very easy to read, so we can hardly complain.

 
Name:
Lauren Forbes
Email:
l.forbes@nls.uk
Date:
20/03/08

A peaceful letter for Easter

William Page Edwards was born in Liverpool in 1836, went to school there, and then studied at St John's College, Cambridge. He was ordained in 1862, and worked his way from being a curate in Stockport, Cheshire to priest in charge of St Peter's in St Marylebone from 1878-1907. He became Canon of Canterbury from 1895-1907, and finally Dean of Salisbury, from 1907-19. He continued to preach occasionally in his 89th year at churches near his home on the Isle of Wight, and died at the grand old age of 92.

I hope you are still with me after the biography, as the letter I've found from him in the archive is both charming and tranquil. It was written from his home at Shanklin on July 10th, 1921, when he would have been 85. Imagine a view out to sea on a warm summer's day and read...

My dear Mr Murray

As I read your letter, a letter with which you have trusted me, I cannot but wish you were here this quiet Sunday afternoon. The house is still; the leaves, so full on the trees, are still; & the broad sea so still & shining, no coastline visible to limit the suggestion of infinity. It is a day & hour when peace is everywhere, soothing to a troubled soul. Yes! I wish you were here!

I have no more to say; but, I from my heart, thank you for your letter & remain yours most truly,

W. Page Roberts

 
Name:
Lauren Forbes
Email:
l.forbes@nls.uk
Date:
04/03/08

The effervescent Mollie

The letters of Mollie (surname as yet unknown) are so good, I'll just let them speak for themselves. They were written in London in 1920:

"My dear Mr Murray, thank you immensely for your letter and for the invitation to the Grosvenor House ball. I am too excited for words about it, and am going to need a perfectly splendiferous frock!!

... "How annoying about the Lords tickets. I do, do hope that I shall be able to get in somehow! If not I shall find a hole in the fence & peep through that, like little boys do at football matches

..."I shall see the Prince of Wales at last! Hoorah!!"

I thought she might well be in her early teens, but a later letter put me right:

"Hoorah! Thank you so very much for getting my ticket... I am getting frightfully excited as the time draws near to Lords' & to the Grosvenor House ball",

and she then goes on to say she is working very hard "going over the typed copy of the book".

I think Noel Coward would have approved.

 
Name:
Lauren Forbes
Email:
l.forbes@nls.uk
Date:
20/02/08

Guns n' Roses

I've now happened upon some letters from Robert Taylor Pritchett (1828-1907), who was a gun maker and landscape painter. What a great combination! He followed in his father's footsteps, working for the firm of Enfield which supplied the East India Company with arms, and became famous as the co-inventor of the Pritchett rifle bullet. But business slumped with the abolition of the East India Company in 1858, so Pritchett turned to art, becoming just as successful in this career.

His connection with Murray comes from his illustrations in the 1890 edition of Charles Darwin's Voyage of the Beagle. A keen yachtsman, his letters show this edition was his idea. He writes on 2nd December 1885:

Dear Sir

The name of "DARWIN" is of such interest to the public and his "Voyage in the BEAGLE" so full of subject that I am going to suggest a carefully illustrated edition to you... Having been over the same ground artistically & observantly, I should do it con amore"

His handwriting itself is very artistic, and one letter, dated 26th June 1896, includes a carefully hand-drawn map showing how to reach his "cottage" as he describes it, at 36 Gloucester Road, Kew.

On the subject of varied careers, I also like the sound of another correspondent, William Pole, who was 'engineer, musician and authority on whist'. Or how about Francis Penrose with his alliterative 'Architect, Archaeologist & Astronomer'? I will have to work on bettering that - Cataloguer, Croupier and Kickboxer sounds good for a start.

 
Name:
Steve Rigden
Email:
s.rigden@nls.uk
Date:
18/02/08

Condolence on the death of Charles Darwin.

In a letter to John Murray III of April 29 [1882], Isabella Bishop commented :

"I have again to condole with you on the loss of a valued literary friend. I suppose that no man has had a stronger hold on the mass of intelligent readers and thinkers than Darwin had."

 
Name:
Lauren Forbes
Email:
l.forbes@nls.uk
Date:
12/02/08

The Clangers have classical roots

I've just come across a letter from John Percival Postgate, the classical scholar. He writes to John Murray in May 1909 to let him know of a new book club at Cambridge University - the Cambridge Greek and Latin Book Club - and to ask if Murray will provide specimen copies of suitable books as promised.

But never mind all that! Having been brought up (way back...) on Pogles' Wood, and being a fan of such classics as Noggin the Nog, Ivor the Engine, the Clangers and Bagpuss, I wondered if JP might be related to Oliver Postgate, the writer of these series. And of course he is, being Oliver's paternal grandfather. I wonder what he was like as a grandad. According to the Dictionary of National Biography, his children had to practise their Latin during mealtimes. I might have gone a bit hungry there...

Meanwhile I also found out that Oliver Postgate is a cousin of Angela Lansbury on his mother's side. Murray she wrote? It's a bit bewildering where this Archive takes you sometimes.

 
Name:
Steve Rigden
Email:
s.rigden@nls.uk
Date:
05/02/08

Wise beyond her years, or unduly modest?

On the 30th December [1859] Isabella Bird [Bishop] wrote to the Reverend Whitwell Elwin, the formidable editor of the Quarterly Review:

"I have just received the proof sheets of my article from Clowes and will return them shortly. I am gratified to find that you have thought any part of it worthy of your pages. I think it was Dr Johnson who advised authors to strike out every portion of their m.s. which particularly pleased them. You have done this for me in omitting the the first 4 pages of my paper which in my estimation constituted the only readable part. It is not however to make a vain appeal against this editorial fiat that I write but to request that the authorship of the article may remain entirely unknown, for whatever weight might be attached to it from its appearance in the Quarterly would vanish if it were known that it was written by a lady of 27. I am sure that you will agree with me in this."

The article in question was published under the title Religious revivals in the Quarterly Review for January 1860.

 
Name:
Lauren Forbes
Email:
l.forbes@nls.uk
Date:
01/02/08

February storms

Hearing about various stricken vessels in February 2008, a letter I came across today caught my attention. George Philpot of Deal writes on Feb 5th 1838 to tell Murray about a vessel in distress he had seen that morning "on Goodwin Sands". When the vessel was spotted:

"a Boat was got Ready for Launching and got a float with great Difficulty, and soon afterward two more attempted but they filled with water and broke to pieces... but the other Boat proceeded and got to the Vessel with great Risk, and let go an anchor and wore the Boat down to her and succeeded in Saving the lives of Seven of her Crew out of ten... two Boys and one man was Drowned before the Boat got to her"

He relates that hundreds of people waited on the beach to help once the crew were brought ashore, in particular a local surgeon, Mr William Hulh. Mr Philpot gives the vessel's name as "the Martin of Sunderland".

 
Name:
Lauren Forbes
Email:
l.forbes@nls.uk
Date:
23/01/08

Charlotte Mew

Some letters in the Archive send you off on a voyage of discovery. I recently came upon a letter to Murray from Florence Hardy, Thomas Hardy's second wife. Writing in June 1922, she thanks Murray for a visit to Albemarle Street along with two friends. She continues:

"It may perhaps interest you to know that the smaller of the two ladies I brought with me - Miss Charlotte Mew - is in my husband's estimation the one woman of genius writing today. She has only published one volume of verse, but he says he believes in years to come she will rank in literature with Emily Bronte. Her life is such a sad one, & I am so glad you gave her such an enjoyable experience, as she has few such."

Charlotte who? I had never heard of her. What on earth became of this "one woman of genius writing today"? Turning to the Dictionary of National Biography I discovered that Charlotte Mew, born in London in 1869, did become a published poet. Her first collection, The Farmer's Bride, was published in 1916, and a second collection, The Rambling Sailor, came out in 1929. She did have a fairly troubled life. Three brothers died in infancy, and two other siblings were committed to an asylum. It's thought that Charlotte and her sister Anne stayed single to avoid passing on what they saw as a family madness.

She was very critical of her own work, and so didn't publish much. She seems to have had a powerful personality, split between 'correct' and wild behaviour. Following her sister's death from cancer, Charlotte's own life was cut short when she committed suicide in 1928. It's a pity she hasn't been remembered in the way Thomas Hardy clearly believed she deserved. But her poetry is still in print, and I recommend it.

 
Name:
Steve Rigden
Email:
s.rigden@nls.uk
Date:
18/01/08

"Honest Hogg" (or, Metaphysical poetry explained).

Washington Irving in his "Abbotsford and Newstead" (of which a manuscript copy is held in the Archive) related the following amusing anecdote about the poetry of James Hogg, "The Ettrick Shepherd", and its effect upon his publisher, William Blackwood.

(Quoted from the manuscript.)

Hogg, in one of his poems, I believe The
Pilgrims of the Sun, had dabbled a little
in metaphysics, and like his heroes had
got into the clouds. Blackwood who
began to affect criticism, argued stoutly
with him as to the necessity of omitting
or elucidating some obscure passage.
Hogg was immovable.

"But man," said Blackwood, "I dinna
ken what ye mean in the passage".
"Hout tout mon," replied Hogg impa=
=tiently, "I dinna ken always what I
mean mysel."

There is many a metaphysical poet
in the same predicament with honest
Hogg.

 
Name:
Steve Rigden
Email:
s.rigden@nls.uk
Date:
18/01/08

Contempt for a vampire

On 1 April 1819 a work entitled The Vampyre : a tale by Lord Byron appeared in the New Monthly Magazine, published by Henry Colburn. The first that Byron knew of his authorship of the tale was when he saw it advertised in Galignani's Messenger, an English language newspaper widely circulated on the continent where he was then residing in Italy. In a letter to the editor of the Messenger, Byron disclaimed the tale, commenting:

"I have besides a personal dislike to 'Vampires' and the little acquaintance I have with them would by no means induce me to divulge their secrets."

Who then was the author?

John Cam Hobhouse, as faithful to the interests of his friend Byron as any of the poet's own beloved hounds, was soon upon the scent. In a letter to John Murray he wrote :

"The Vampyre is positively
not Ld Byron's and I do think that
it smells woefully of apothecary's
stuff. How anyone can palm such wretched
nonsense upon the public as coming
from the author of Childe Harold
I cannot make out. The hint
of the story and, perhaps, ten words
together may have been given by
his Lordship : but the whole as it
now appears is an impudent
fabrication or I am more mistaken
than I ever was in my life."

"Apothecary's stuff"? Hobhouse was after his quarry, and soon drove him from covert. In a letter that appeared in the Courier (May 5, 1819) John William Polidori, formerly Byron's personal physician, acknowledged his own authorship of "The Vampyre".

 
Name:
Dan Gray
Email:
d.gray@nls.uk
Date:
18/01/08

The drinks are on the house (of Murray)

As it's Friday, many of my thoughts turn immediately to beer (well, not immediately, not as soon as I wake up; I'm not Rab C. Nesbitt). I'm able to think about alcohol a lot in my job as a JMA cataloguer: the archive is positively flowing with booze.

I've spent much of the recent part of my working life sorting through the papers of that mad, bad and dangerous to catalogue poet, Lord Byron. Byron's handwriting in the early years is perfectly legible, and every one of his flirtatious and incendiary words can be deciphered. Yet as he ages, reading his handwriting makes me feel a bit like a partially-sighted 93 year-old man squinting to make out a message written in font size 2. In Arabic.

Much of this incoherence is, I am convinced, down to Byron's penchant for a tipple. Anyone who has ever had a brilliant idea after a few pints and scribbled it down on a piece of paper before falling asleep will know the feeling: you wake up the next morning to find that the piece of paper reads 'owls dangerous taking frames of pictures in Portsmouth' or such like. You might laugh, but the BBC seemed pretty interested in that particular idea.

I once stumbled upon a letter of his with a dark red stain strewn across the bottom half of the page. Upon further inspection (i.e. holding it up to the light, the cataloguing version of kicking the tyres of a car), I noticed that this stain bore something of a resemblance to port. Not for the first time, I felt a certain sense of empathy for Byron - I know that crushing feeling when some bloke knocks your pint over.

Elsewhere in the archive, I enjoyed Washington Irving's P.S. to John Murray: "I am writing with a hollowed head and spinning hand, having returned at almost daylight from a fancy ball at the British Ambassador's". What a romantic way to describe a hangover. I wonder if he got a kebab on the way home.

James Hogg was a bit of a steamer too, downing a whisky every time a line of poetry pleased him. Mind, I'm a bit rock 'n' roll like that as well; each time I complete a good XML mark-up transcription, I eat a Midget Gem.

It shouldn't come as a surprise that alcohol is a recurring theme in the archive: in 1769 the original John (Mc)Murray began to try his hand flogging ale. Murray himself had a soft spot for, among other things, port, sherry, mountain malaga, punch and rum. When he left for Ireland in 1775 an inventory of his London cellar counted 51 one bottles of rum alone.

His diary of that year gives account of a particularly inebriated night out in Ireland's capital. Having downed six bottles of wine which "intoxicated me uncommonly", at midnight Murray decided to go "away in a chair, but broke from it in Essex Street and ran after some girls". If the Daily Mail had been around then they would have blamed binge drinking on the influence of writers and publishers, in the same way they blame murders on song lyrics now.

All of this is making me thirsty. Mine's a mountain malaga.

 
Name:
Lauren Forbes
Email:
l.forbes@nls.uk
Date:
15/01/08

The great unknowns

There's been plenty of publicity about the big names in the archive: Byron, Scott, Darwin, Livingstone etc. But I've been sorting and listing the general incoming correspondence, which includes letters from many as yet unidentified and completely unknown people. They can be just as fascinating, not to mention odd, intriguing or plain weird. Here are just a few that have caught my eye:

Most appropriate name must go to Capt Lindsay Brine, writing several letters in the mid 19th century about his travels. He writes from Malta in Nov. 1865 describing unusual navigation techniques en route:

"Etna was always smoking - Stromboli used to act for us like a lighthouse and shoot up its glare visible twenty miles - Vesuvius did the same in a less degree."

Meanwhile Miss Lilian Kerr requests a reference for a prospective employee, in Feb. 1928. Her organisation Useful Women provides a host of highly respectable services, as the letter's accompanying leaflet shows, including:

"Emergency guests for dances, dinners and house parties provided;
Mending for bachelors, business women and others;
Underwear of every description made to order;
Yule-tide gifts a speciality".

Hmmm, I could have done with them recently. For the Yule-tide gifts, you understand, not for anything else.

Finally this next short letter will give us some identification problems. Written in London in 1894, it says simply:

"Dear Maude, No I know not the man. Collar him! Yrs, E.A.A."

More coming soon...

 

The bloggers


Lauren Forbes Lauren Forbes,
Cataloguer


Lauren worked on the archive until September 2009, and sorted the vast amount of correspondence in the archive. Some letters were from well-known names, such as Neville Chamberlain and Mary Somerville, but many are from unknown correspondents. There is a generous smattering of bishops, archbishops, lords and ladies – not to mention letters from around the world, such as India, Iraq, New Zealand, America, to name but a few.


Daniel Gray Daniel Gray, Cataloguer

Dan was a cataloguer on the archive until September 2009. He worked mainly on the Byron papers. These include poetry, prose, correspondence, bits of curtain and the odd piece of sea monster. He also listed the Murray family papers – a fascinating resource for charting the evolution of this great publishing house.



Stephen Rigden Stephen Rigden, Cataloguer

Stephen is arranging, numbering and creating the catalogue descriptions for the contents of the John Murray Archive. He's often busy deciphering 19th century handwriting and creating transcriptions of these for this website. Stephen also flags up any fascinating tidbits of correspondence he comes across for the blog.